Licenses: Difference between revisions
From Joomla! Documentation
m New page: <pre> <!-- this is a copy from http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Licenses --> * Unknown|I don't know exactly * Free licenses: ** JEDL|Joomla! Electronic Documentation Licence (recomm... |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
customized for docs.joomla.org | |||
* Unknown|I don't know exactly | For the templates used in this list containing the license' grant text see [[:Category:License templates]]. | ||
* | List agreed by {{user|Elin}} | ||
** | ---- | ||
This is a list of suitable licenses (rearranged, --<span class="plainlinks">[[User:CirTap|CirTap]] <small>([[User talk:CirTap|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/CirTap|contribs]])</small></span> 12:26, 7 May 2008 (EDT)) | |||
** | <!-- | ||
THIS LIST CONTAINS TEMPLATE LINKS! Don't copy to the message without editing! | |||
** | --> | ||
** | * {{tl|JEDL}}|Joomla! Electronic Documentation Licence (recommended) | ||
* {{tl|Unknown}}|I don't know exactly | |||
* Other free licenses: | |||
** {{tl|PD}}|PD: public domain | |||
** {{tl|GFDL}}|GFDL: GNU Free Documentation License | |||
** {{tl|LGPL}}|LGPL: GNU Lesser General Public License | |||
** {{tl|GPL}}|GPL: GNU General Public License | |||
* Creative Commons (exception): | |||
** {{tl|CC-by-sa-2.5}}|Attribution ShareAlike 2.5 | |||
* Non-free license (exception): | * Non-free license (exception): | ||
** CopyrightByWikimedia|Wikimedia + Wikicommons images | ** {{tl|CopyrightByOSM}}|Open Source Matters | ||
** {{tl|CopyrightByWikimedia}}|Wikimedia + Wikicommons images | |||
---- | |||
The wiki already features content that does NOT comply to the [[JEDL]] | |||
*Articles and probably most media files copied from joomla.org are {{tl|CC-by-sa-2.5}} | |||
*The various Joomla! Logos, which I believe are not JEDL compliant either ({{tl|CopyrightByOSM}}?) | |||
*People's fotos are unlikely compliant to [[JEDL]] (ie. [[GHOP students]]) | |||
*consider adding {{tl|PD}}, probably provides not harm, and {{tl|GFDL}}. | |||
** "tiny" licence templates can be made available to display a licence icon only instead of the [[:Category:License templates|big boxes]] | |||
--CirTap 12:37, 22 March 2008 (EDT) | |||
Content on the j.org sites is all copyright OSM so it is fine to use here as are the logos. We can ask James about issuing a second license with JEDL but I don't see that as a problem at all. | |||
Photos should be considered fair use I think, or when someone submits a photo they have the copyright for they can give fair use permission. Elin | |||
GFDL would be a problem potentially because it conflicts with JEDL, since JEDL is less free. We wrote the JEDL because the GFDL and CC did not meet our needs. | |||
I would question whether we should allow any CC materials into the wiki. First, we are making a combined work and that is very tricky. Because the work as a whole is NOT going to be CC, it is JEDL and that precisely allows some things that CC-NC and CC-A do not allow. | |||
I would urge strict compliance on this because we want to be able to reuse these materials as we wish without having to worry. Any other way and we will need a paragraph by paragraph data base with licensing. | |||
Elin | |||
Latest revision as of 17:27, 7 May 2008
customized for docs.joomla.org
For the templates used in this list containing the license' grant text see Category:License templates. List agreed by Elin (talk • contribs)
This is a list of suitable licenses (rearranged, --CirTap (talk • contribs) 12:26, 7 May 2008 (EDT))
- {{JEDL}}|Joomla! Electronic Documentation Licence (recommended)
- {{Unknown}}|I don't know exactly
- Other free licenses:
- Creative Commons (exception):
- {{CC-by-sa-2.5}}|Attribution ShareAlike 2.5
- Non-free license (exception):
- {{CopyrightByOSM}}|Open Source Matters
- {{CopyrightByWikimedia}}|Wikimedia + Wikicommons images
The wiki already features content that does NOT comply to the JEDL
- Articles and probably most media files copied from joomla.org are {{CC-by-sa-2.5}}
- The various Joomla! Logos, which I believe are not JEDL compliant either ({{CopyrightByOSM}}?)
- People's fotos are unlikely compliant to JEDL (ie. GHOP students)
- consider adding {{PD}}, probably provides not harm, and {{GFDL}}.
- "tiny" licence templates can be made available to display a licence icon only instead of the big boxes
--CirTap 12:37, 22 March 2008 (EDT)
Content on the j.org sites is all copyright OSM so it is fine to use here as are the logos. We can ask James about issuing a second license with JEDL but I don't see that as a problem at all.
Photos should be considered fair use I think, or when someone submits a photo they have the copyright for they can give fair use permission. Elin
GFDL would be a problem potentially because it conflicts with JEDL, since JEDL is less free. We wrote the JEDL because the GFDL and CC did not meet our needs.
I would question whether we should allow any CC materials into the wiki. First, we are making a combined work and that is very tricky. Because the work as a whole is NOT going to be CC, it is JEDL and that precisely allows some things that CC-NC and CC-A do not allow.
I would urge strict compliance on this because we want to be able to reuse these materials as we wish without having to worry. Any other way and we will need a paragraph by paragraph data base with licensing.
Elin