MediaWiki talk

Licenses: Difference between revisions

From Joomla! Documentation

CirTap (talk | contribs)
m New page: <pre> <!-- this is a copy from http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Licenses --> * Unknown|I don't know exactly * Free licenses: ** JEDL|Joomla! Electronic Documentation Licence (recomm...
 
CirTap (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<pre>
customized for docs.joomla.org
<!-- this is a copy from http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Licenses -->
 
* Unknown|I don't know exactly
For the templates used in this list containing the license' grant text see [[:Category:License templates]].
* Free licenses:
List agreed by {{user|Elin}}
** JEDL|Joomla! Electronic Documentation Licence (recommended)
----
** PD|PD: public domain
This is a list of suitable licenses (rearranged, --<span class="plainlinks">[[User:CirTap|CirTap]] <small>([[User talk:CirTap|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/CirTap|contribs]])</small></span> 12:26, 7 May 2008 (EDT))
** CC-by-sa-2.5|Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 2.5
<!--
** GFDL|GFDL: GNU Free Documentation License
    THIS LIST CONTAINS TEMPLATE LINKS! Don't copy to the message without editing!
** GPL|GPL: GNU General Public License
-->
** LGPL|LGPL: GNU Lesser General Public License
* {{tl|JEDL}}|Joomla! Electronic Documentation Licence (recommended)
* {{tl|Unknown}}|I don't know exactly
* Other free licenses:
** {{tl|PD}}|PD: public domain
** {{tl|GFDL}}|GFDL: GNU Free Documentation License
** {{tl|LGPL}}|LGPL: GNU Lesser General Public License
** {{tl|GPL}}|GPL: GNU General Public License
* Creative Commons (exception):
** {{tl|CC-by-sa-2.5}}|Attribution ShareAlike 2.5
* Non-free license (exception):
* Non-free license (exception):
** CopyrightByWikimedia|Wikimedia + Wikicommons images
** {{tl|CopyrightByOSM}}|Open Source Matters
</pre>
** {{tl|CopyrightByWikimedia}}|Wikimedia + Wikicommons images
 
 
----
The wiki already features content that does NOT comply to the [[JEDL]]
*Articles and probably most media files copied from joomla.org are {{tl|CC-by-sa-2.5}}
             
*The various Joomla! Logos, which I believe are not JEDL compliant either ({{tl|CopyrightByOSM}}?)
       
*People's fotos are unlikely compliant to [[JEDL]] (ie. [[GHOP students]])
*consider adding {{tl|PD}}, probably provides not harm, and {{tl|GFDL}}.
** "tiny" licence templates can be made available to display a licence icon only instead of the [[:Category:License templates|big boxes]]
--CirTap 12:37, 22 March 2008 (EDT)
 
Content on the j.org sites is all copyright OSM so it is fine to use here as are the logos. We can ask James about issuing a second license with JEDL but I don't see that as a problem at all.
 
Photos should be considered fair use I think, or when someone submits a photo they have the copyright for they can give fair use  permission. Elin
 
GFDL would be a problem potentially because it conflicts with JEDL, since JEDL is less free. We wrote the JEDL because the GFDL and CC did not meet our needs.
 
I would question whether we should allow any CC materials into the wiki. First, we are making a combined work and that is very tricky. Because the work as a whole is NOT going to be CC, it is JEDL and that precisely allows some things that CC-NC and CC-A do not allow.
 
I would urge strict compliance on this because we want to be able to reuse these materials as we wish without having to worry. Any other way and we will need a paragraph by paragraph data base with licensing.
 
Elin

Latest revision as of 17:27, 7 May 2008

customized for docs.joomla.org

For the templates used in this list containing the license' grant text see Category:License templates. List agreed by Elin (talkcontribs)


This is a list of suitable licenses (rearranged, --CirTap (talkcontribs) 12:26, 7 May 2008 (EDT))

  • {{JEDL}}|Joomla! Electronic Documentation Licence (recommended)
  • {{Unknown}}|I don't know exactly
  • Other free licenses:
    • {{PD}}|PD: public domain
    • {{GFDL}}|GFDL: GNU Free Documentation License
    • {{LGPL}}|LGPL: GNU Lesser General Public License
    • {{GPL}}|GPL: GNU General Public License
  • Creative Commons (exception):
  • Non-free license (exception):



The wiki already features content that does NOT comply to the JEDL

  • Articles and probably most media files copied from joomla.org are {{CC-by-sa-2.5}}
  • The various Joomla! Logos, which I believe are not JEDL compliant either ({{CopyrightByOSM}}?)
  • People's fotos are unlikely compliant to JEDL (ie. GHOP students)
  • consider adding {{PD}}, probably provides not harm, and {{GFDL}}.
    • "tiny" licence templates can be made available to display a licence icon only instead of the big boxes

--CirTap 12:37, 22 March 2008 (EDT)

Content on the j.org sites is all copyright OSM so it is fine to use here as are the logos. We can ask James about issuing a second license with JEDL but I don't see that as a problem at all.

Photos should be considered fair use I think, or when someone submits a photo they have the copyright for they can give fair use permission. Elin

GFDL would be a problem potentially because it conflicts with JEDL, since JEDL is less free. We wrote the JEDL because the GFDL and CC did not meet our needs.

I would question whether we should allow any CC materials into the wiki. First, we are making a combined work and that is very tricky. Because the work as a whole is NOT going to be CC, it is JEDL and that precisely allows some things that CC-NC and CC-A do not allow.

I would urge strict compliance on this because we want to be able to reuse these materials as we wish without having to worry. Any other way and we will need a paragraph by paragraph data base with licensing.

Elin