Vulnerable Extensions List: Difference between revisions
From Joomla! Documentation
→Are Vulnerabilities confirmed?: new section |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
# Should each item be it's own file? | # Should each item be it's own file? | ||
# Links to old forum topics are broken. Is there a pattern we can use to map these to the new forum path/topics? | # Links to old forum topics are broken. Is there a pattern we can use to map these to the new forum path/topics? | ||
== Are Vulnerabilities confirmed? == | |||
I ask because, I cannot find any confirmation that a couple of these vulnerabilities are valid. | |||
Obviously, many of theses are correct, but it seems like some of this is just parroting, without installing the extension, and running a test. | |||
Should the unconfirmed vulnerabilities be flagged as such? | |||
Revision as of 16:34, 3 May 2010
ToDo
- Some links left to cleanup.
- Should this format be converted to a wiki template for easier editing?
- Should each item be it's own file?
- Links to old forum topics are broken. Is there a pattern we can use to map these to the new forum path/topics?
Are Vulnerabilities confirmed?
I ask because, I cannot find any confirmation that a couple of these vulnerabilities are valid.
Obviously, many of theses are correct, but it seems like some of this is just parroting, without installing the extension, and running a test.
Should the unconfirmed vulnerabilities be flagged as such?